Pubic lice are becoming extinct1.
This got me thinking about the evolution of
pubic lice. Our distant ancestors were covered in hair from head to
foot until about 1.2 million years ago2. It doesn’t take such
a leap of the imagination to therefore assume that they were also covered from
head to foot in lice. As (most) humans evolved to be increasingly less
hairy does that mean the types of lice which lived in human hair were forced to
live in smaller and smaller habitats?
The conclusion must be drawn that head lice and
pubic lice are examples of divergent evolution and both must have had a common
ancestor at some point (the whole-body louse, if you will).
Will nits lament the passing of their brothers and
sisters, who were long ago relegated to the pungent marshlands of the pubis?
No comments:
Post a Comment